Published:
Peer review is one of the most important quality-control systems in science, but it is also under pressure. Submission volume keeps growing, reviewers are overloaded, and many authors wait months for feedback. At the same time, large language models are becoming much better at reading papers, summarizing arguments, checking structure, and generating detailed critiques.
Published:
Peer review is one of the most important quality-control systems in science, but it is also under pressure. Submission volume keeps growing, reviewers are overloaded, and many authors wait months for feedback. At the same time, large language models are becoming much better at reading papers, summarizing arguments, checking structure, and generating detailed critiques.
Published:
Peer review is one of the most important quality-control systems in science, but it is also under pressure. Submission volume keeps growing, reviewers are overloaded, and many authors wait months for feedback. At the same time, large language models are becoming much better at reading papers, summarizing arguments, checking structure, and generating detailed critiques.
Published:
Peer review is one of the most important quality-control systems in science, but it is also under pressure. Submission volume keeps growing, reviewers are overloaded, and many authors wait months for feedback. At the same time, large language models are becoming much better at reading papers, summarizing arguments, checking structure, and generating detailed critiques.
Published:
Peer review is one of the most important quality-control systems in science, but it is also under pressure. Submission volume keeps growing, reviewers are overloaded, and many authors wait months for feedback. At the same time, large language models are becoming much better at reading papers, summarizing arguments, checking structure, and generating detailed critiques.